Re: Big number of connections

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big number of connections
Date: 2016-04-04 15:06:30
Message-ID: CAFj8pRD5_ito0Kk_yN8mfufWADjpFgZvaWY1Zo4afY9vF3Es_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2016-04-04 16:43 GMT+02:00 Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>:

> Il 04/04/2016 15:33, Pavel Stehule ha scritto:
>
>>
>>
>> PostgreSQL doesn't contain integrated pooler - so any connection to
>> Postgres enforces one PostgreSQL proces. A performance benchmarks is
>> showing maximum performance about 10x cores. With high number of
>> connections you have to use low size of work_mem, what enforces can have
>> negative impact on performance too. Too high number of active PostgreSQL
>> processes increase a risk of performance problems with spin locks, etc.
>>
>
> :-O
> I wasn't absolutely aware of this thing... is there a way to monitor
> active connections, or at least to report when they grow too much?
> (say, I have an 8-core system and want to track down if, and when, active
> connections grow over 80)
>

100 connections are probably ok, 200 is over the optimum - there is some
tolerance.

We are speaking about optimum - I had possibility to work with system where
max connections was 300, 600 - and it was working. But then the
max_connection doesn't work as safeguard against overloading. And the
system under higher load can be pretty slow.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Thanks
> Moreno.-
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-04-10 00:41:14 Re: Adding a ROLLUP switches to GroupAggregate unexpectedly
Previous Message Artem Tomyuk 2016-04-04 15:03:57 Re: Big number of connections