From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
Date: | 2015-04-25 20:23:21 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD2Gp_m1nUh7s=DCfFb6aJ-LEWOQHDNE+S65WqGHNh_hQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
2015-04-24 19:16 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Example:
> >>
> >> context_messages = -warning, -error, +notice
> >
> >
> > I prefer your first proposal - and there is a precedent for plpgsql -
> > plpgsql_extra_checks
> >
> > It is clean for anybody. +-identifiers looks like horrible httpd config.
> :)
>
> I have to agree on that :) Just thought this is the best we can do if
> we want to reduce the number of GUCs to a minimum.
>
I played with some prototype and I am thinking so we need only one GUC
plpgsql.display_context_messages = 'none'; -- compatible with current
plpgsql.display_context_messages = 'all';
plpgsql.display_context_messages = 'exception, log'; -- what I prefer
I implemented [ (WITH|WITHOUT) CONTEXT ] clause for RAISE statement
RAISE NOTICE WITH CONTEXT 'some message';
RAISE NOTICE WITH CONTEXT USING message = 'some message';
RAISE EXCEPTION WITHOUT CONTEXT 'other message';
The patch is very small with full functionality (without documentation) - I
am thinking so it can work. This patch is back compatible - and allow to
change default behave simply.
plpgsql.display_context_messages can be simplified to some like
plpgsql.display_context_min_messages
What do you think about it?
Regards
Pavel
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
plpgsql-raise-context.patch | text/x-patch | 13.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-04-25 21:05:48 | Re: BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-04-25 20:18:25 | Re: Bug in planner |