From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "immersive(dot)excel(at)gmail(dot)com" <immersive(dot)excel(at)gmail(dot)com>, x3v0-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function... |
Date: | 2013-08-06 05:47:47 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD0-J-_c_bL7AAazuo+W4QhcRfJjOFkOpKpPnXRUjNUXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2013/8/6 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> Pavel Stehule escribió:
>
>> you code can be translated to
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE
>> FUNCTION GROUP_CONCAT_ATOM(field1 TEXT, field2 TEXT, delimiter TEXT)
>> RETURNS TEXT AS $$
>> BEGIN
>> RETURN COALESCE(field1||delimiter||field2, field2, field1);
>> END;
>> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>
> Actually you don't even need plpgsql for this, do you ..
There is better optimized plpgsql - not sure, why - probably, so there
is not possible inlining .. and start of SQL engine is little bit
slower than start of plpgsql.
postgres=# create table f(a text, b int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# insert into f select 'Ahoj', random()*100 from
generate_series(1,10000);
select group_concat(a,',') from f group by b;
PL/pgSQL .. 36 ms
SQL .. 49 ms
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | liuyuanyuan | 2013-08-06 07:12:53 | inserting huge file into bytea cause out of memory |
Previous Message | immersive.excel@gmail.com | 2013-08-06 05:41:06 | Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function... |