From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ToDo: log plans of cancelled queries |
Date: | 2013-01-11 16:34:01 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCvrWFkzBREOABmT59GV7YA__B0uz-xhcDLCJCaNUq0zw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/1/11 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2013/1/11 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
>> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> > An even better feature would be to be able to send a signal to a
>>> > running query to log its currently executing plan. That way you can
>>> > ask "Why so slow?" before deciding to kill it.
>>>
>>> That could conceivably work. At least it wouldn't require running
>>> EXPLAIN in a failed transaction.
>>
>> I like this idea, in general, also. Taking that to the next level would
>> be figuring out how you can do the same kind of thing through an
>> interactive psql session where the user running the query doesn't need
>> access to the database server or PG log files...
>>
>
> this is simple - it can be printed via elog(WARNING, ...) to original console
theoretically we can show current state via EXPLAIN ANALYSE result
>
>> We can send a 'cancel query', how about a 'report on query' which
>> returns the plan and perhaps whatever other stats are easily available?
>
> there is only one question - that POSIX signal we can use?
>
> Pavel
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-11 16:35:33 | Re: psql \l to accept patterns |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-01-11 16:33:55 | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |