Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-09-28 18:37:47
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCv8sfkud=--eRTakwBJGpEkK8ebMxj40ugCyk8Z6H=2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

2016-09-28 18:57 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > 2016-09-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> >> I propose to push my current patch (ie, move PL function
> >> source code to \df+ footers), and we can use it in HEAD for awhile
> >> and see what we think. We can alway improve or revert it later.
>
> > I had some objection to format of source code - it should be full source
> > code, not just header and body.
>
> That would be redundant with stuff that's in the main part of the \df
> display. I really don't need to see the argument types twice, for
> instance.
>

I am sorry, I disagree. Proposed form is hard readable. Is not possible to
simply copy/paste.

I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.

Regards

Pavel

>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2016-09-28 18:55:19 Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2016-09-28 18:28:40 Re: should xlog_outdesc modify its argument?