Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Date: 2017-02-08 07:33:30
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCjhygpW5mZYoSw9s6J5rQmLAVmo6usG9h2hcPXP_4ctg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-02-08 8:30 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > What is sense for list of databases?
>
> ECPG uses it for example, see 0992259.
>
> > Some option --template can be great - with backpatch if it is possible.
>
> That's not really complicated to patch... That could be a nice task
> for a starter.
>

Today I am doing some training - I can look on it at evening

Regards

Pavel

> --
> Michael
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-02-08 07:40:41 Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-08 07:30:26 Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress