Re: Packages, inner subprograms, and parameterizable anonymous blocks for PL/pgSQL

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages, inner subprograms, and parameterizable anonymous blocks for PL/pgSQL
Date: 2021-12-23 06:31:30
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCijMf5tqZSGc0xb6dq2j4V++pMe2qbNcck-Pm2Cf096Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> From PostgreSQL's SQL perspective the session variables are common
> database objects (contra SQL/PL where package variables are SQL/PL language
> objects), and SQL disallows ambiguity. This is a little bit more complex
> problem, because session variables can be used everywhere in Postgres (not
> just in PL/pgSQL).
>
>
>
I though Oracle's PL/SQL, not SQL/PL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Mühlbeyer 2021-12-23 07:28:25 Re: [External] Re: md5 issues Postgres14 on OL7
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2021-12-23 06:25:43 Re: Packages, inner subprograms, and parameterizable anonymous blocks for PL/pgSQL