| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ? |
| Date: | 2016-10-12 17:53:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRChu7HqCXcdyjNnco7thzhRECwPp=U4nkdRDcr1z_Jh0w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-10-12 19:48 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 10/12/16 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm not sure that Peter was voting for retaining "internal name", but
> > personally I prefer that to deleting prosrc entirely, so +1.
>
> I'm not sure what the point of showing the internal name would be if we
> have already declared that the source code of non-C functions is not
> that interesting. But I don't have a strong feeling about it.
>
The benefit is for people who have to look on C implementation of internal
functions. Probably not too big group - but it can be interesting for
beginners who starting with reading of PostgreSQL code.
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-10-12 17:59:58 | logical replication connection information management |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-10-12 17:48:41 | Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ? |