From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |
Date: | 2014-06-22 18:21:25 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC_W-T0-hg95Lfj5NVus=xbbpQ-96J=bBe483afHwK43Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-06-22 19:47 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 2014-06-22 09:27:24 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > The idea with the GUC name is that if we ever get support for
> > > cancelling transactions we can name that
> > > idle_in_transaction_transaction_timeout?
> > > That seems a bit awkward...
> >
> > No, the argument was that for all the other *_timeout settings what
> > came before _timeout was the thing that was being terminated. I
> > think there were some votes in favor of the name on that basis, and
> > none against. Feel free to give your reasons for supporting some
> > other name.
>
> My reasons for not liking the current GUC name are hinted at above. I think
> we'll want a version of this that just fails the transaction once we
> have the infrastructure. So we should choose a name that allows for
> a complimentary GUC.
> CAKFQuwZCg2uur=tUdz_C2aUwBo87ofFGhn9Mx_HZ4QD-b8fe2Q(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
> suggested
> On 2014-06-19 10:39:48 -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
> > "idle_in_transaction_timeout=10s"
> > "idle_in_transaction_target=session|transaction"
>
> but I don't like that much. Not sure what'd be good, the best I
> currently can come up with is:
> idle_in_transaction_termination_timeout =
> idle_in_transaction_cancellation_timeout =
>
+1
Pavel
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-06-22 18:31:34 | Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-22 17:47:43 | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |