| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
| Date: | 2013-02-27 18:33:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCYSbcPQ-f50uvKRvcZUC0dEuDXLaHxD3CWT_PpXBPucA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/2/27 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
> * Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> autocomplete send a SQL query in every iteration to server - so it is
>> not any new overhead. And if we should to write some smarted routine,
>> then I prefer server side due better reusability and better exception
>> processing than psql environment - and a possibility of access to
>> system caches and auxiliary functions for arguments processing. This
>> routine can be smart enough to support autocomplete and unique
>> identification without needless exceptions - and then psql behave can
>> be more smooth and consistent.
>
> We already have it and it works quite well from my POV. I don't think
> we need to over-engineer this.
I don't agree so it works well - you cannot use short type names is
significant issue
Pavel
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-27 18:36:17 | Re: isolation test problem with MSVC (VC2012) / Windows 8 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-02-27 18:30:53 | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |