From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters |
Date: | 2015-01-19 07:05:23 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCXbvBeHxY88+OkkxcK8+t_Sd4k96kQqRCABtDtrYXKtg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-01-19 4:54 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > two years a operator "=>" is marked as deprecated (from PostgreSQL 9.2).
> >
> > Isn't time to use it for named parameters now (for PostgreSQL 9.5) ?
>
> I'm cool with that. It's possible that there are installations out
> there that still have => operators installed, but every
> still-supported release warns you not to do that, and the hstore
> change exists in three released versions. Anyway, no amount of
> waiting will eliminate the hazard completely.
>
> > I am sending a implementation where syntax based on "=>" symbol is second
> > (but preferred) variant of ":=" syntax .. syntax ":=" will be supported
> > still.
> >
> > Here is a patch
>
> I think you should just remove the WARNING, not change it to an error.
> If somebody wants to quote the operator name to be able to continue
> using it, I think that's OK.
>
I have no problem with it. Just I'll try if there are no some unexpected
problem and I'll send a updated patch
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-19 07:10:47 | Re: Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code |
Previous Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2015-01-19 06:54:24 | Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL |