From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Sergey Shinderuk <s(dot)shinderuk(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, joel(at)compiler(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |
Date: | 2024-02-20 19:29:29 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCToV4rqhU7p=Loa2n6WjgqiXKcOdq9Hdo+W-2YkYNUGA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
here is new rebase of this patch set.
Years ago I promised to implement support for transactional behaviour. I
wrote it in patch 0019. It is based on my patch from 2020 but the memory
cleaning is more readable and I believe it is correct. All other patches
are without touching. The first five patches are of "should to have" type,
all others (with new one) are "nice to have" type (although support for
simply expr evaluation or parallel execution has strong benefits).
Regards
Pavel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-20 19:42:30 | Re: BUG #18348: Inconsistency with EXTRACT([field] from INTERVAL); |
Previous Message | Dilshod Urazov | 2024-02-20 19:19:21 | Re: Proposal: Adjacent B-Tree index |