From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source |
Date: | 2018-06-04 18:44:37 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCSdd4Az5bfaokTgNmr-Gmq4vqpYoeFZ2=02dYMpmTBcQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2018-06-04 20:34 GMT+02:00 Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > Microsoft has bought GitHub for $7.5 billion, is this a threat to the
>> open
>> > source community?
>>
>> A fair question, but one that seems entirely off-topic for the Postgres
>> lists, since we don't depend on GitHub. (And that's a thing for which
>> I'm very glad today.)
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
> Core postgres is OK, but I think there are a number of postgres-related
> projects that might be on places like GitHub.
>
I have few projects there - Orafce, plpgsql_check, and pspg. I hope so
these projects are well protected by BSD licence - and distributed
redundant nature of git. I hope so there is not reason for panic this
moment. I have not a big data in non git sources - issues, and others.
But I understand so there are projects that are (can be) in conflicts of
interests with Microsoft, and it can be problem.
Regards
Pavel
--
> Mike Nolan
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marco Rossi | 2018-06-04 20:18:04 | Store login credentials client-side |
Previous Message | Jason Petersen | 2018-06-04 18:41:28 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |