From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking |
Date: | 2023-12-15 13:19:07 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCRKgBbyEEcvF2UOy7RGtcmjLjBrY8zR7pCkr36RM5ttg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dne pá 15. 12. 2023 14:14 uživatel Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:
>
>
> Dne pá 15. 12. 2023 14:09 uživatel Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
> napsal:
>
>> On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 13:21 +0100, Josef Šimánek wrote:
>> > Inspired by Simon Riggs' keynote talk at PGCounf.eu 2023 sharing list
>> > of ideas for PostgreSQL
>> > (https://riggs.business/blog/f/postgresql-todo-2023) I have crafted a
>> > quick patch to do SQL syntax validation.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>>
>> I like the idea. But what will happen if the SQL statement references
>> tables or other objects, since we have no database?
>>
>
> It checks just the identifier is valid from parser perspective, like it is
> valid table name.
>
There can by two levels, like plpgsql or like pllgsql_check
Regards
Pavel
>
>
>> Yours,
>> Laurenz Albe
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2023-12-15 13:35:46 | Re: "pgoutput" options missing on documentation |
Previous Message | Josef Šimánek | 2023-12-15 13:14:11 | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking |