Re: open items for 9.4

Dne 29.9.2014 18:00 "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> napsal(a):
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> > On 2014-09-29 11:50:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> The items I see are:
> >>
> >> - Remove xloginsert_slots/xloginsert_locks GUC - Not yet!!
> >>
> >> The text seems to indicate that there's some disagreement on this
> >> point. I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not to keep the
> >> GUC, but if we're going to remove it it should probably happen before
> >> beta3. It's going to be impossible to remove once we've released with
> >> it, I suspect.
> >
> > I vote for keeping it.
>
> No real preference. But ISTM that if we're uncertain, it's probably a
> good idea to keep them.
>
>
> >> - TAP tests still have some pretty severe problems
> >>
> >> Some of these issues have been fixed; but maybe not all.
> >
> > If there are, they don't seem blockers to me personally.
>
> +1. Good to have, but not release blockers.
>
>
> >> - autovacuum scheduling starvation and frenzy
> >>
> >> This doesn't seem to be a new problem, so I don't think we should
> >> consider it a stop-ship issue.
> >
> > +1.
>
> +1.
>
>
> >> - pg_dump fails with --if-exists and blobs
> >>
> >> This looks like a 9.4 regression.
> >
> > Alvaro, IIRC you were looking at this one?
>
> This does seem to be the "major" release stopper, other than the json
stuff.
>

I sent two variants of fix month ago. It should be somewhere in mailing
list archive

>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers