| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-08 07:06:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCOa0PNPbN5x5FLfKqRtaTRvfrkUSwpd32xW30MMD9eBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-07-08 9:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Fujii-san has reminded me of the fact that we do not show in \df+ the
> parallel status of a function. The output of \df+ is already very
> large, so I guess that any people mentally sane already use it with
> the expanded display mode, and it may not matter adding more
> information.
> Thoughts about adding this piece of information?
>
It has 11 columns. I don't see any problem to show few columns more. It is
better than missing important information.
Regards
Pavel
--
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-07-08 07:22:35 | Re: MVCC overheads |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-07-08 07:04:55 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |