Re: bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext
Date: 2015-05-29 10:38:53
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCFuqjVKR6csDJGVzEDV1dO79=nSnkZuqcxbt3rB0xoCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Done

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/5/257/

2015-05-29 9:56 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
>
> 2015-05-29 9:53 GMT+02:00 Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> Pavel, will it be good if you separately submit the
>> "bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext"
>> patch in this commitfest?
>>
>>
> ok, I'll do it
>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2015-05-29 10:43:58 Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-05-29 10:04:26 Re: Free indexed_tlist memory explicitly within set_plan_refs()