| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
| Date: | 2015-07-28 03:24:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCE8N3bLvRfAk5i8gNDmP0=bQCHHtD_Ru8uVLLKHvnjfw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-07-27 21:57 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
> On 07/27/2015 02:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to run parallel execution
>>
>> psql -At -c "select datname from pg_database" postgres | xargs -n 1 -P 3
>> psql -c "select current_database()"
>>
>>
>>
>
> I don't think it's going to be a hugely important feature, but I don't see
> a problem with creating a new option (-C seems fine) which would have the
> same effect as if the arguments were contatenated into a file which is then
> used with -f. IIRC -c has some special characteristics which means it's
> probably best not to try to extend it for this feature.
>
ok, I'll try to write patch.
Pavel
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2015-07-28 03:29:10 | Re: more RLS oversights |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2015-07-28 03:23:16 | Re: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled |