From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | hamann(dot)w(at)t-online(dot)de |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimizing query? |
Date: | 2013-02-02 10:11:18 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCCkLKptsY_cwDRBywTk-OGhPyofO5MFbhuL5UUR1SHZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2013/2/2 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2013/2/2 <hamann(dot)w(at)t-online(dot)de>:
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> but maybe https://github.com/dimitri/prefix can help
>>>>
>>
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> thanks - this works perfect. However, it does not seem to play well
>> with the optimizer, so I ended up with
>>
>> select all candidates into a temp table using prefix operator
>> apply all other conditions by joining that temp table to original ones
>>
seriously - it is typical solution - and it is great so PostgreSQL
help to you :)
Regards
Pavel
>
> you can send proposals to enhancing to Dimitry - He will be happy :)
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>> Regards
>> Wolfgang
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Riverón Escobar | 2013-02-02 15:42:04 | What language is faster, C or PL/PgSQL? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-02-02 09:25:40 | Re: Optimizing query? |