Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date: 2015-11-03 15:16:48
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCCG_-5-U_OdLG0=Mxmiwn7ozAp38vozi79LxcRsDJMLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-11-03 4:16 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > fixed patch attached
>
> The documentation included in this patch doesn't really make it clear
> why -g is different from or better than -c.
>

I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.

Regards

Pavel

>
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
psql-group-command-04.patch text/x-patch 11.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-03 15:23:35 Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby
Previous Message Bill Moran 2015-11-03 15:04:31 RFC/WIP: adding new configuration options to TOAST