Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

Hi

pá 11. 9. 2020 v 17:00 odesílatel 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> napsal:

> I have written the README for the GTT, which contains the GTT requirements
> and design.
> I found that compared to my first email a year ago, many GTT Limitations
> are now gone.
> Now, I'm adding comments to some of the necessary functions.
>

There are problems with patching. Please, can you rebase your patch?

Regards

Pavel

>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
>
>
> > 2020年7月31日 上午4:57，Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> 写道：
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Please continue to review the code.
> >
> > This patch is pretty light on comments. Many of the new functions have
> > no header comments, for example. There are comments here and there in
> > the body of the new functions that are added, and in places where
> > existing code is changed there are comments here and there, but
> > overall it's not a whole lot. There's no documentation and no README,
> > either. Since this adds a new feature and a bunch of new SQL-callable
> > functions that interact with that feature, the feature itself should
> > be documented, along with its limitations and the new SQL-callable
> > functions that interact with it. I think there should be either a
> > lengthy comment in some suitable file, or maybe various comments in
> > various files, or else a README file, that clearly sets out the major
> > design principles behind the patch, and explaining also what that
> > means in terms of features and limitations. Without that, it's really
> > hard for anyone to jump into reviewing this code, and it will be hard
> > for people who have to maintain it in the future to understand it,
> > either. Or for users, for that matter.
> >
> > --
> > Robert Haas
> > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>