Re: proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins

2014/1/12 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>

> On 1/12/14, 5:33 PM, I wrote:
>
>> On 1/9/14, 11:41 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>> There are two basic questions:
>>>
>>> b) will we support same API still - a reference on plugin_info in exec
>>> state is a issue - described in patch.
>>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance, but why does the plugin_info have to be in the
>> executor state? If we're going to change the API, can't we pass it
>> directly to the callback function?
>>
>
> Oh, I think I'm being stupid -- we'd only have to do what *if* we don't
> want to change the API? Then my vote is for breaking the API.
>

yes. It is my vote too.

It is trouble - but support same API is really ugly - on second hand -
there are only few plpgsql plugins - and every plugin needs recompilation
for new mayor version and fixing will be easy.

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>
>
> Regards,
> Marko Tiikkaja
>