From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | aasat <satriani(at)veranet(dot)pl> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: "stored procedures" |
Date: | 2013-04-16 09:25:18 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC6uF1B=i_Di8hY=CB5dQ4K0QuKqkCAM3htVpH3FinsvQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
2013/4/16 aasat <satriani(at)veranet(dot)pl>
> Is "stored procedures" planned in future? I think is a "most missing"
> future
> today in Postgres.
>
It is in ToDo, but nobody working on this feature in this moment, probably.
>
> Using a dblink to emulate commit in transaction is very complicated
>
>
probably autonomous transaction will be implemented first - and should be
really nice feature.
Regards
Pavel
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/stored-procedures-tp4331060p5752274.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Colin 't Hart | 2013-04-16 09:40:16 | [PATCH] Add \ns command to psql |
Previous Message | aasat | 2013-04-16 08:44:44 | Re: "stored procedures" |