Re: dropdb --force

út 3. 9. 2019 v 18:46 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
napsal:

> On 2019-Jul-25, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> > čt 25. 7. 2019 v 5:11 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> >
> > > Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > > * I'm concerned that the proposed syntax is not future-proof.
> >
> > Can be
> >
> > DROP DATABASE '(' options ...) [IF EXISTS] name
> >
> > ok?
>
> Seems weird to me. I'd rather have the options at the end with a WITH
> keyword. But that's just me, looking at gram.y for other productions
> involving ^DROP.
>
> > I don't think so server side implementation is too helpful - there is lot
> > of situations, where DDL command is much more practical.
>
> I tend to agree. Not really a fan of the double-timeout business,
> though.
>
> So when are you submitting an updated patch, addressing the other items
> that Tom mentions in his review?
>

I would to prepare patch this week.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>