From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql command for bytea output |
Date: | 2011-10-21 18:44:27 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC2vSeD4-TK_zJnvG6YYTa2hSHDRsZAcXyOoQLSYjqtQg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/10/21 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com>:
>
> A few months ago, I blogged about the difficulty of getting psql to put a
> bytea datum into a file. See
> <http://people.planetpostgresql.org/andrew/index.php?/archives/196-Clever-trick-challenge.html>.
> Today I ran into the problem again, and it struck me that we could fairly
> easily have a new command to handle this, called, say, bcopy. So it would
> look like:
>
> \bcopy (select generate_bytea()) to foo.bin
>
>
> Thoughts?
isn't better to fix current tools to work well with bytea?
Pavel
>
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-10-21 18:46:41 | Re: psql command for bytea output |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-21 18:33:31 | Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now? |