| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Date: | 2015-11-09 12:50:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC-PucpbhBR7v45u88uAB42mfhfczvkyRU+bOtSxiD7Qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-11-09 13:32 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:
> On Monday 09 November 2015 13:29:30 you wrote:
> > It is ugly, but you can wrap it to function - so still I don't see any
> > reason, why it is necessary
> For example, I'm writing a lot of queries by hands...
> This functionality is available in many languages and it's just
> convenient. Of
> course it is possible and without it, but why?
>
New symbols increase a complexity of our code and our documentation.
If some functionality can be implemented via functions without performance
impacts, we should not to create new operators or syntax - mainly for
corner use cases.
Regards
Pavel
>
> Thanks.
> --
> YUriy Zhuravlev
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-11-09 12:55:29 | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Previous Message | YUriy Zhuravlev | 2015-11-09 12:38:16 | Re: Some questions about the array. |