Re: Review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2011-11-22 14:04:25
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBzT+iiYnGDc4nMdjjuqbTVRp2bVoiAJ2jXT=EHXkgG+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/11/22 Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>:
> I tried to look at the patch, but it does not apply to current master,
> probably because of bit rot.
>
> Can you submit an updated version?
>
> The patch contains docs and regression tests and is context diff.
> I'll mark it "waiting for author".

please wait, I plan to work on this topic at thursday.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-11-22 14:07:30 Re: Singleton range constructors versus functional coercion notation
Previous Message Rudyar 2011-11-22 13:41:05 Re: explain analyze query execution time