From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bvimalvictor(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15971: Behaviour of SUBSTR function depending on its arguments |
Date: | 2019-08-21 10:44:31 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBuSU_kUfEhv+85vMHgF4TR86d_9dkz7P6xVL2UUu0YhA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
st 21. 8. 2019 v 9:03 odesílatel PG Bug reporting form <
noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> napsal:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 15971
> Logged by: VIMAL VICTOR B
> Email address: bvimalvictor(at)gmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 10.4
> Operating system: Linux
> Description:
>
> Hi,
>
> select substr('abcdef',1,2) val1, substr('abcdef',0,2) val2,
> substr('abcdef',-1,2) val3;
>
> The above query in Postgres returns expected result for val1 ('ab') but for
> val2 and val3, it returns 'a' and '' respectively. Oracle and most of other
> RDBMS systems would return 'ab' for val1 and val2. When the start position
> is -ve, then the start position will be considered from end of input
> string.
> The start position can be considered either as 0 or 1 and substring from
> that position can be returned by considering the max length of the input
> string, which is logically correct. But when -ve value given for start
> position and returning empty string '', which does not seem logically
> correct. Kindly consider this case and let me know your thoughts.
>
Orafce support substr function with Oracle behave
https://github.com/orafce/orafce
Regards
Pavel
>
> Regards,
> Vimal
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2019-08-21 10:46:34 | Re: Postgres 11.5.1 failed installation |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2019-08-21 10:26:30 | Re: BUG #15971: Behaviour of SUBSTR function depending on its arguments |