| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL flavors |
| Date: | 2016-02-23 18:29:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBj3PmFWS--RQ3F_bWkUDzrCka9XuOW509jb032RRHJnw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2016-02-23 19:26 GMT+01:00 Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
> On 02/23/2016 10:22 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>>
>> Vertica was written from scratch in C++. Maybe gram.y was used from Pg.
>> But the client and SQL are strongly inspirited by Postgres. vsql is not
>> psql probably, because psql is better. Last three years is not Vertica
>> protocol compatible with Postgres. I don't know a reason why - I am
>> expecting some strange marketing
>>
>
> According to some insider sources, they broke compatibility because it was
> "faster" (without any actual performance testing). In an update release,
> no less. I've been told that they lost a bunch of users over this because
> it broke their tools with no warning.
Interesting
Thank you for info
Pavel
>
>
> --
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Red Hat OSAS
> (any opinions are my own)
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan S | 2016-02-23 19:12:25 | json function question |
| Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2016-02-23 18:26:32 | Re: PostgreSQL flavors |