| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Date: | 2013-12-05 11:20:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBaEX9K-0JLJveQFX7MQnrLr3ztV98TWKh+y5RWrZK6jA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/12/5 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> On 2013-12-05 11:54:20 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2013/12/5 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> > We can introduce some assert polymorphic function
> >
> > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION notnull(any, message text) RETURNS any, that
> can
> > be used for check inside SQL
>
> Uh. How is that going to help applications that upgraded, without having
> noticed a pretty obscure notice in the release notes?
>
this function doesn't replace a "obscure notice in the release notes".
On second hand is better to throw unpractically designed feature early
than hold it forever.
If there was not too aversion against GUC, I can say, so for some time GUC
can be solution. But it isnot
Regards
Pavel
>
> If this were day one, I would agree we should go that way, but today...
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-05 11:39:38 | Re: better atomics - v0.2 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-05 11:18:44 | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |