Re: pgbench more operators & functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench more operators & functions
Date: 2017-05-23 18:47:07
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBXs30SMGvZ7_QBxLX5uQ0qJCi-8n4d1sHEmek7_N4v_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

I am watching this patch - it looks so there are not problems. I found only
issue in documentation - new CASE expression is not documented.

Regards

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Beena Emerson 2017-05-23 19:22:21 Re: Default Partition for Range
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2017-05-23 18:32:32 FW: PGBuildfarm member peripatus Branch REL9_2_STABLE Failed at Stage PLCheck-C