Re: proposal: schema variables

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Philippe BEAUDOIN <phb07(at)apra(dot)asso(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: 2020-02-15 08:05:01
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBQSbOvK94QJCZGY7xqiuT7R7tuGKgci+CXGYONs5PGOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

po 10. 2. 2020 v 19:47 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

>
>
> pá 7. 2. 2020 v 17:09 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> rebase
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>
> Hi
>
> another rebase, fix \dV statement (for 0001 patch)
>

rebase

Pavel

> Regards
>
> Pavel
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-schema-variables-20200215.patch.gz application/gzip 64.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-02-15 08:29:52 Re: Collation versioning
Previous Message Bryn Llewellyn 2020-02-15 05:06:02 Re: jsonb_object() seems to be buggy. jsonb_build_object() is good.

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MingJu Wu 2020-02-15 11:04:48 Partial index creation always scans the entire table
Previous Message Michael Lewis 2020-02-14 17:54:29 Re: How to avoid UPDATE performance degradation in a transaction