Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Charles Gomes <charlesrg(at)outlook(dot)com>, Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table
Date: 2012-12-28 12:48:19
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBN-4q0J0tHAJTLFjGP1a1Mw=STLFwoFbtTuvYA+PjUYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello

>
> Also, for bulk insert, have you tried "for each statement" triggers instead
> of "for each row"?
> This would look like a lot of inserts and would not be fast in
> single-row-insert case, but can give you benefit for huge inserts.
> It should look like
> insert into quotes_2012_09_10 select * from new where cast(new.received_time
> as date) = '2012-09-10' ;
> insert into quotes_2012_09_11 select * from new where cast(new.received_time
> as date) = '2012-09-11' ;
> ...

It has only one problem - PostgreSQL has not relations NEW and OLD for
statements triggers.

Regards

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vitalii Tymchyshyn 2012-12-28 13:18:38 Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2012-12-28 12:41:41 Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table