| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xmltable SQL conformance |
| Date: | 2017-08-07 18:47:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBEs7+ZtmzoJ8QmQSHUqbTXqckDKQyb4J1JQm+Os3H6PQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-08-07 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 8/3/17 17:07, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I'm looking to update the SQL conformance list for the release.
> I'm
> > wondering whether the new xmltable feature fully completes the
> > following
> > items:
> >
> > X300 XMLTable
> > X301 XMLTable: derived column list option
> > X302 XMLTable: ordinality column option
> > X303 XMLTable: column default option
> > X304 XMLTable: passing a context item
> >
> > It looks so to me, but maybe you know more.
> >
> >
> > I am not sure what X304 means? Other are not supported 100% .. are
> > related to unsupported XQuery lang.
> >
> >
> > Others than x300, 301, 302, 303 are unsupported.
>
> I think you mean supported here? Because they quite clearly are.
>
I am sorry - it my bad English :( - Czechism
> > I don't understand to
> > X304 well - related syntax is ignored in Postgres if I understand.
>
> This means that you pass in the document to work on, which is supported.
>
> Thanks for your input. I have updated the features list accordingly.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-07 19:16:08 | Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-07 18:45:47 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |