From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kalyanov Dmitry <kalyanov(dot)dmitry(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |
Date: | 2014-09-17 20:17:22 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBEM74SrW=9r=PWwu3cQL332J_B=CNNUT4woK0iVQBQAw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-17 22:07 GMT+02:00 Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>:
> On 09/16/2014 10:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 09/16/2014 10:57 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> >> On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why we don't introduce a temporary functions instead?
> >>
> >> I think that'd be a lot cleaner and simpler. It's something I've
> >> frequently wanted, and as Hekki points out it's already possible by
> >> creating the function in pg_temp, there just isn't the syntax sugar for
> >> "CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION".
> >>
> >> So why not just add "CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION"?
> >
> > Sure, why not.
>
> Because you still have to do
>
> SELECT pg_temp.my_temp_function(blah);
>
> to execute it.
>
this problem should be solvable. I can to use a temporary tables without
using pg_temp schema.
Pavel
>
> >> It means two steps:
> >>
> >> CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION ... $$ $$;
> >>
> >> SELECT my_temp_function(blah);
>
> That won't work; see above.
> --
> Vik
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dev Kumkar | 2014-09-17 20:36:46 | Re: [SQL] pg_multixact issues |
Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2014-09-17 20:07:21 | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |