From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Nikolai Zhubr <n-a-zhubr(at)yandex(dot)ru>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Server-side hooks for user session start and session end |
Date: | 2015-09-26 18:23:03 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBE0jgwNGuk-KaNBAuuyFTYYU-4XXeKLJ_OCyoMW_CWwg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2015-09-26 19:59 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > 2015-09-26 19:53 GMT+02:00 Nikolai Zhubr <n-a-zhubr(at)yandex(dot)ru>:
> >> And the events of session start and session end would seem quite generic
> >> and usefull anyway?
>
> > I don't know. I am pretty sceptical - from my experience this request was
> > related to unhappy designed projects.
>
> A session-end hook seems pretty problematic to me: you simply cannot
> guarantee that it will run at all. (Consider process crash or server
> abort cases.) So anything built on the assumption that it gets to run
> at session end is going to be inherently unreliable.
>
> A session-start hook is already possible at the C-code level, using
> session_preload_libraries. It wouldn't be hard to write an extension
> that exposed that in some useful way to SQL code.
>
years ago I tried it, if I remember well. I had a problems with SPI calls,
because some caches was not initialized. I am not sure, and I didn't test
last time.
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-26 18:29:36 | Re: Server-side hooks for user session start and session end |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-26 17:59:47 | Re: Server-side hooks for user session start and session end |