Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl
Date: 2017-03-09 10:12:09
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBDNdfqM-efy7BjhP_pCAyGFn8FgfLaqx8QLCx=vo59nA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

2017-03-09 10:25 GMT+01:00 Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>:

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:25:14 +0100
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > is this patch complete? I don't see new regress tests
>
> Oh, really! I've forgot that git diff doesn't include files which are
> not added into git.
>
> So, no old regress tests as well.
>
> Sorry for posting incomplete patch.
>
> Attached fixed version of patch with regress tests and couple more
> whitespace issues fixed.
>

the regress tests is unstable

the proc name has mutable pid

! (procedure "__PLTcl_proc_16503" line 3)
invoked from within
! "__PLTcl_proc_16503 SPI"

Regards

Pavel

> With best regards, Victor
>
> --
> Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2017-03-09 10:13:11 Re: Logical replication existing data copy
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2017-03-09 10:06:57 Re: Logical replication existing data copy