Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

ne 30. 9. 2018 v 0:21 odesílatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 23:32, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 at 16:44, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 22 March 2018 at 23:25, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here is the updated version of patch, rebased after recent conflicts
> and with
> > > > suggested documentation improvements.
> > >
> > > Another rebased version of the patch.
> >
> > I've noticed, that I never updated llvmjit code for the arrayref
> expressions,
> > and it's important to do so, since the patch introduces another layer of
> > flexibility. Hence here is the new version.
>
> Here is another rebased version, and a bit of history: the first
> prototypes of
> this patch were sent more than 3 years ago. Of course the patch evolved
> significantly over this period, and I take it as a good sign that it wasn't
> rejected and keeps moving through the commitfests. At the same time the
> lack of
> attention makes things a bit frustrating. I have an impression that it's
> sort
> of regular situation and wonder if there are any ideas (besides the well
> known
> advice of putting some efforts into review patches from other people,
> since I'm
> already doing my best and enjoying this) how to make progress in such
> cases?
>

This feature looks nice, and it can be great when some values of some not
atomic type should be updated.

Regards

Pavel