Re: missing support of named convention for procedures

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
Date: 2018-04-14 15:30:04
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB8qLcy+u5fvPMT_b7LdBhhy+YrAQ4NFsMDBsG_=ncjhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2018-04-14 15:58 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:

> On 3/22/18 10:19, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > attached patch should to fix it
>
> Committed.
>

Thank you

Pavel

>
> I had to make a small tweak to make INOUT + DEFAULT parameters work in
> PL/pgSQL.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-14 15:30:08 Re: partitioning code reorganization
Previous Message David Arnold 2018-04-14 15:27:58 Re: Proposal: Adding json logging