| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Date: | 2015-11-11 16:29:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRB7-aRXgjB0ppLriPRBxi=vsiJpFx6y8yHEhx8y-vjG+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-11-11 12:25 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:
> On Friday 06 November 2015 12:55:44 you wrote:
> > Omitted bounds are common in other languages and would be handy. I
> > don't think they'd cause any issues with multi-dimensional arrays or
> > variable start-pos arrays.
>
> And yet, what about my patch?
> Discussions about ~ and{:} it seems optional.
>
In this case the syntax is major issue. Any language should not to have any
possible feature on the world.
My opinion on this proposal is same - the general benefit for users is
minimal and disputable - Introduction new syntax is wrong idea.
So -1
Pavel
>
> Thanks.
> --
> YUriy Zhuravlev
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-11 16:31:37 | Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization |
| Previous Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2015-11-11 15:41:50 | Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data |