broken formatting?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: broken formatting?
Date: 2023-02-25 12:56:30
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAzszM_QRV-LLgfYuCNc1tNxo6ozr=5c0bc_eMC-1-Qkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
index a83feea396..12c6548675 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ numeric_support(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
* scale of the attribute have to be applied on the value.
*/
Datum
-numeric (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
+numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Numeric num = PG_GETARG_NUMERIC(0);
int32 typmod = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);

Regards

Pavel

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2023-02-25 13:59:04 Re: Doc update for pg_stat_statements normalization
Previous Message CK Tan 2023-02-25 12:19:20 Re: PG_FREE_IF_COPY extraneous in numeric_cmp?