From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc |
Date: | 2014-01-13 14:36:18 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAz=uZx4=egdrx1i3mHLSjBGtVb8+5DUY7tnCC=GNixDA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
2014/1/13 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:10:24AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I find the rules above so complex that I don't see how we can
> recommend
> > a best syntax. What I did in the patch I just posted was to put the
> > preferred operator first, but I don't see why we want to get into
> these
> > details in the docs.
> >
> >
> > just a note about preferred variant should be ok. Using ':=' in GET
> DIAGNOSTICS
> > statement is just bad idea.
>
> Agreed. I added a sentence in the first mention of GET DIAGNOSTICS, and
> indicated it was generic for that command. What I also added was your
> description of when to use := and =, but I put it in the C comments so
> we have a record of it and if we need to expand the description or
> behavior later.
>
I'll be more happy if a comment about GET DIAGNOSTICS statement will be in
user space.
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + Everyone has their own god. +
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-01-14 20:21:28 | Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-01-13 14:04:33 | Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc |