Re: Packages: Again

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages: Again
Date: 2017-01-13 21:30:14
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAuxfGaM1vMFF8WgRnXZVCz48Q7=Ju=rcazSYiW=48PYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-01-13 22:16 GMT+01:00 Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>:

> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> show patch and show a advantages against schema, please.
>
> I have tried to describe the advantage.
> If the community doesn’t agree, that’s fine.
> I do not see how expending the effort of back porting a patch (and getting
> clearance for that from my employer) will enhance my argument.
>

This theme is opened, and any discussion is welcome - it is not simple
task, to design any solution that be natural in PostgreSQL environment

Regards

Pavel

>
> Cheers
> Serge
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-01-13 21:39:02 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-13 21:24:57 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take