| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Packages: Again |
| Date: | 2017-01-13 21:30:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAuxfGaM1vMFF8WgRnXZVCz48Q7=Ju=rcazSYiW=48PYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-01-13 22:16 GMT+01:00 Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> show patch and show a advantages against schema, please.
>
> I have tried to describe the advantage.
> If the community doesn’t agree, that’s fine.
> I do not see how expending the effort of back porting a patch (and getting
> clearance for that from my employer) will enhance my argument.
>
This theme is opened, and any discussion is welcome - it is not simple
task, to design any solution that be natural in PostgreSQL environment
Regards
Pavel
>
> Cheers
> Serge
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-01-13 21:39:02 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-13 21:24:57 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |