Re: version 0 calling convention

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Lybarger <mlybarger(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: version 0 calling convention
Date: 2021-07-22 16:22:22
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAmNAPFP7jJNpprywpqcaoYjNdtmajxQOM-gzxO+0wGnA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

čt 22. 7. 2021 v 18:21 odesílatel Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
napsal:

> On 7/22/21 9:18 AM, Mark Lybarger wrote:
> > i have some sql functions written in c code using version 0 calling
> > convention. it's working fine on postgresql 9.6, but i'm migrating to
> > v13. has this calling convention been removed?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/xfunc-c.html#id-1.8.3.13.7
>
> "Currently only one calling convention is used for C functions (“version
> 1”). Support for that calling convention is indicated by writing a
> PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1() macro call for the function, as illustrated below."
>
> >
> > my function creation give an error,
> >
> > SQL Error [42883]: ERROR: could not find function information for
> > function "test_func"
> > Hint: SQL-callable functions need an accompanying
> > PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(funcname).
>

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=5ded4bd21403e143dd3eb66b92d52732fdac1945

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rama Krishnan 2021-07-22 17:10:21 Re: Doubt on pgbouncer
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2021-07-22 16:21:27 Re: version 0 calling convention