Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: wenjing(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tony(dot)zhu(at)ww-it(dot)cn, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2021-01-25 18:02:20
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAieeKqe2cL-FuD_UfHLZn7tUpjcduh1G1gZPW72kMXyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

út 22. 12. 2020 v 4:20 odesílatel wenjing <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:

> HI all
>
> I rebased patch, fix OID conflicts, fix some comments.
> Code updates to v41.
>

Please, can you do rebase?

Regards

Pavel

>
> Wenjing
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-01-25 18:05:35 Re: The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes
Previous Message Tommy Li 2021-01-25 17:46:28 Re: a verbose option for autovacuum