| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: issues with dropped columns in plpgsql code again |
| Date: | 2013-05-11 04:34:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAfaNUZzVrRZAkW+d=uOT6+_AvBktJOmv4TOBYxAeg9Kw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dne 10.5.2013 22:17 "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal(a):
>
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > One user reported a issues with triggers related to dropped columns.
> > When I checked his code, I found a more possible problems.
>
> This is just the same kind of modified-rowtype problem we've discussed
> before.
Yes. It is same problém.
>
> I continue to maintain that the only realistic fix is to stop using the
> PLPGSQL_DTYPE_ROW infrastructure for variables of externally-defined
> composite types. In the last go-round, this was rejected on the
> (unproven) assumption that it would make things slower. But as a wise
> man once said, you can make code arbitrarily fast if it doesn't have to
> give the right answer.
Yes. It is probably solutions.
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-05-11 04:58:47 | Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |
| Previous Message | Amit kapila | 2013-05-11 03:33:15 | Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums |