From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimizing query? |
Date: | 2013-01-31 14:09:00 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAdEwk1fnrCi+bU8dq5nGc8pDQ9tosD4-C3tff6dQ+dgw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2013/1/31 Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr>:
> Le jeudi 31 janvier 2013 à 11:06 +0100, Pavel Stehule a écrit :
>> 2013/1/31 Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr>:
>> >
>> > Suppose I have a query of the form
>> >
>> > SELECT my_function(column_1), column_2
>> > FROM my_table
>> > GROUP BY my_function(column_1)
>> > ORDER BY my_function(column_1);
>> >
>> > where my_function is a user defined function.
>> >
>> > How many times is the function computed?
>>
>> if function is stable or immutable, then once per row
>>
>
> In this post (watch for line-wrap) :
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRAdYL1-hCxH
> +QSZQKHt9YnoaOiGkfX4cNc9mzUTimcs1w(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>
> you wrote that it is usually better not to mark SQL functions (as
> opposed to plpgsql functions).
>
> So should I mark SQL functions stable/immutable if I use them in a query
> like the one above, or is it unnecessary?
>
It should not be marked
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Salutations, Vincent Veyron
> http://marica.fr/site/demonstration
> Logiciel de gestion des contentieux juridiques et des sinistres d'assurance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-01-31 14:11:01 | Re: Version numbers for binaries |
Previous Message | Vincent Veyron | 2013-01-31 14:00:30 | Re: Optimizing query? |