From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order? |
Date: | 2014-09-12 04:26:29 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAbeHjiDYCaouVqL7KXhXu6d11zYtbZkrYQJpC6uFBx_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-12 3:44 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> On 9/4/14 4:23 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > It is little bit hard to read.
>
> > maybe better be more verbose - and it can be in alone function, because
> > it is "analyze only"
> >
> > if (stage == -1)
> > {
> > for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> > {
> > puts(gettext(stage_messages[i]));
> > executeCommand(conn, stage_commands[i], progname, echo);
> > run_vacuum_command(conn, sql.data, echo, dbname, table,
> progname);
> > }
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > puts(gettext(stage_messages[stage]));
> > executeCommand(conn, stage_commands[stage], progname, echo);
> > run_vacuum_command(conn, sql.data, echo, dbname, table, progname);
> > }
>
> Done that way, thanks!
>
Thank you
It is interesting feature
Pavel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-09-12 05:13:46 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-09-12 03:14:37 | Re: proposal (9.5) : psql unicode border line styles |