Re: Copy command Faster than original select

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Belal Al-Hamed <belalhamed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Copy command Faster than original select
Date: 2015-02-06 09:55:32
Message-ID: CAFj8pRA_BnWX9a7MfQ8tKvMNoi3ojdPQbbihwYKDK=O0jetXUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2015-02-06 10:50 GMT+01:00 Belal Al-Hamed <belalhamed(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> fast as
>
> Query returned successfully: 43602 rows affected, 1089 ms execution time.
>

so bottle neck have to be some where between client and server

Pavel

>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Copy-command-Faster-than-original-select-tp5836886p5836902.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus de Oliveira 2015-02-06 10:36:39 Re: Copy command Faster than original select
Previous Message Belal Al-Hamed 2015-02-06 09:50:05 Re: Copy command Faster than original select