From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Belal Al-Hamed <belalhamed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Copy command Faster than original select |
Date: | 2015-02-06 09:55:32 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA_BnWX9a7MfQ8tKvMNoi3ojdPQbbihwYKDK=O0jetXUg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2015-02-06 10:50 GMT+01:00 Belal Al-Hamed <belalhamed(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> fast as
>
> Query returned successfully: 43602 rows affected, 1089 ms execution time.
>
so bottle neck have to be some where between client and server
Pavel
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Copy-command-Faster-than-original-select-tp5836886p5836902.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2015-02-06 10:36:39 | Re: Copy command Faster than original select |
Previous Message | Belal Al-Hamed | 2015-02-06 09:50:05 | Re: Copy command Faster than original select |