From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <jcflack(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: XMLDocument (SQL/XML X030) |
Date: | 2025-01-25 15:05:10 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAPBfvx4fKuf6LPTyekUpND+jHFiJoqfSuyKMtu+D8VNQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
so 25. 1. 2025 v 15:10 odesílatel Chapman Flack <jcflack(at)acm(dot)org> napsal:
> On 01/25/25 02:16, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > because the function does nothing, then it is useless to convert input to
> > XML and force detosting
> >
> > Maybe the body of the function should be just
> > ...
> > PG_RETURN_DATUM(PG_GETARG_DATUM(0));
>
> That sort of motivated my question upthread about whether there is
> already a function somewhere in the codebase that does exactly that
> and could be named in the pg_proc entry for xmldocument, as an
> alternative to supplying a brand-new one.
>
this should not be a problem, because the already created function
XMLDOCUMENT surely will not be in the pg_catalog schema.
>
> Maybe this is the only instance where it turns out that 'identity'
> is the right behavior for a function. But if it could conceivably
> happen again, a single C function (maybe even named identity) could
> reduce code duplication and make quite clear what the behavior is
> with a \sf.
>
I didn't find any function like this.
Regards
Pavel
>
> A generic 'identity' function would be lacking the #ifdef USE_LIBXML
> and the error message, but I'm not convinced those matter here
> anyway. Without XML support, you'll already have raised that error
> in any attempt to construct a non-null XML argument to pass, and if
> you're passing NULL and the function is strict, you'll never see
> the error message from here anyway.
>
> Regards,
> -Chap
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-01-25 16:18:35 | Re: why -Fdance archive format option works with ./pg_restore but not with ./pg_dump? |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2025-01-25 14:10:06 | Re: XMLDocument (SQL/XML X030) |